ArticlePNAS nexus2026
Fast barcode calling based on
Article in PNAS nexus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Benchmarking DNA barcode decoding strategies under high error rates.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA barcodes, which are short DNA strings, are regularly used as tags in pooled sequencing experiments to enable the identification of reads originating from the same sample. A crucial task in the subsequent analysis of pooled sequences is barcode calling, where one must identify the corresponding barcode for each read. This task is computationally challenging when the probability of synthesis and sequencing errors is high, like in photolithographic microarray synthesis. Identifying the most similar barcode for each read is a theoretically attractive solution for barcode calling. However, an all-to-all exact similarity calculation is practically infeasible for applications with millions of barcodes and billions of reads. Hence, several computational approaches for barcode calling have been proposed, but the challenge of developing an efficient and precise computational approach remains. Here, we propose a simple, yet highly effective new barcode calling approach that uses a filtering technique based on precomputed
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.