ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Active elements, effects, and working mechanisms of creative arts therapies in forensic psychiatric care: a realist review.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Mental disorders are highly prevalent among forensic detainees, complicating treatment and increasing recidivism risk. Due to limited insight and communication difficulties, experiential approaches, such as creative arts therapies are needed. Creative arts therapies - including art therapy, music therapy, drama therapy, and dance/movement therapy - use psychotherapeutic engagement with art modalities to achieve therapeutic goals. As empirical studies demonstrate their effectiveness, questions shift from whether these interventions work to how and why they work. Methods: In this review, we applied principles of realist review approach to analyze how and why CATs work by identifying active elements and working mechanisms, aiming to clarify causal pathways and inform targeted clinical application. Results: Twenty-seven studies were included with 1437 participants in total. Based on realist review standards, four studies were excluded for relevance and six for rigor, leaving 17 studies included in the review. The analyses resulted in twelve models identifying active elements of arts therapies in forensic care, and explaining how these contribute to observed outcomes. Overall, a hierarchical structure can be observed, in which the identified active elements range from those grounded in fundamental physical and bodily experiences, to those facilitating emotional expression and recognition, progressing further to elements that engage higher-order cognitive processes -such as attention regulation and executive or inhibitory functioning- and culminating in elements that foster social interaction and prosocial behavior. Discussion: These models offer a conceptual framework for understanding creative arts therapies in forensic contexts and guide further empirical research and refinement of clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.