ArticleEuropean oral research2026
Does platelet-rich fibrin improve the clinical outcomes of intentional replantation in the treatment of periodontally hopeless teeth?
Article in European oral research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A scientometric study on research trends and characteristics of tooth intentional replantation.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of using platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) on clinical parameters in intentional replantation (IR) treatment. Materials and methods: Data were obtained from 32 mandibular anterior teeth with a 15-month follow-up, treated with either IR (n=17) or IR+PRF (n=15). Periodontal parameters included probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), and keratinized tissue height (KTH), all of which were assessed retrospectively. Results: PD reduction at mesial and midlingual sites was greater in the IR+PRF group at the 15-month follow-up (p=0.043 and p=0.017, respectively), whereas CAL gain in the IR+PRF group was significantly higher at 3, 6, and 15 months (p less than 0.05). GI scores were similar in both groups, while PI scores were higher in the IR group at 6 and 15 months (p less than 0.05). Changes in KTH were similar in both groups at all follow-up periods. Conclusion: IR can be considered for the treatment of periodontally hopeless mandibular anterior teeth, and combining IR with PRF may improve clinical outcomes. However, its clinical use should be recommended cautiously due to the lack of histological data regarding the effects of PRF on IR healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.