ArticleActa medica Lituanica2025
Mortality Rates of Minor vs Major Lower Extremity Amputations in Diabetic Patients.
Article in Acta medica Lituanica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neglected infected Charcot neuroarthropathy of the ankle: limb salvage using a one-stage reconstruction by distraction histogenesis principles.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mortality rates between minor (e.g., removal of toes or part of the foot) and major (e.g., below- or above-the-knee) lower extremity amputations (LEA) vary significantly in diabetic patients. Other factors, including survival rates, rehabilitation outcomes, and healthcare burden, are also notably impacted by the type of amputation performed. Objective: This narrative review aims to analyze and compare mortality rates following minor and major LEA in diabetic patients, by highlighting key risk factors and their impact on patient outcomes. Methods: A narrative review of existing literature was conducted by using searches of Results: Major LEA is associated with significantly higher short- and long-term mortality rates, with five-year survival ranging from 10% to 48%, compared to 29% to 69% for minor LEA. The key risk factors for mortality include chronic renal disease, peripheral arterial disease, sepsis, and poor glycemic control. While minor LEA offers better survival rates, it carries a higher risk of progression to major amputation if diabetes-related complications persist. Conclusion: The findings highlight the critical importance of early intervention, strict glycemic control, and multidisciplinary care to improve the survival and quality of life in diabetic patients undergoing LEA. Limb preservation strategies should be prioritised whenever possible, as minor amputations lead to better long-term outcomes. Future research should focus on refining risk stratification and optimizing rehabilitation programs to enhance patient prognosis post-amputation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.