Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41659141›Full record

ArticleActa medica Lituanica2025

Bilateral Inguinal Hernia Repair: Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Versus Open Lichtenstein.

Mykhaylo O Yosypenko, Oleg V Shulyarenko, Hryhorii O Havrylov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta medica Lituanica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mykhaylo O YosypenkoShupyk National Healthcare University of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2659-1238
Oleg V ShulyarenkoBogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6780-8587
Hryhorii O HavrylovClinic "Medikom", Kyiv, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8425-8134

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To compare the outcome of laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair versus the open Lichtenstein technique in the treatment of primary bilateral inguinal hernias. Materials and methods: The study design was comprised of a matched and randomized research: a total of 93 patients were enrolled in the study and operated in clinic " Result: No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups concerning the mean age, sex, body mass index, patient distribution by hernia type, European Hernia Society hernia type, and ASA score ( Conclusions: The findings of this trial indicate that laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair offers substantial benefits for patients undergoing bilateral inguinal hernioplasty. The duration until resumption of normal activities was 1.5 times significantly longer for patients in the open hernia repair Group 2 compared to those in the laparoscopic hernia repair Group 1.

Indexed as

inguinal hernialaparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repairLichtenstein approachmesh

Identifiers

PMID41659141
PMCPMC12875561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.