ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026
Cardiac Sarcoidosis: Pathophysiology and Diagnostic-Therapeutic Processes.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sarcoidosis is a rare inflammatory disorder of unknown etiology, characterized by the formation of non-caseating granulomas in affected organs. Additionally, sarcoidosis typically involves multiple systems, with the lungs and thoracic lymph nodes being most commonly affected. While many cases are self-limited and resolve spontaneously, cardiac involvement, although relatively uncommon, can be particularly severe. Indeed, cardiac sarcoidosis may lead to life-threatening arrhythmias, severe heart failure, or sudden cardiac death, significantly impacting prognosis. Meanwhile, the heterogeneity of presentation and disease course can make diagnosis and treatment challenging. An endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is considered the gold standard for diagnosing cardiac sarcoidosis (CS); despite its high specificity, the sensitivity of this technique is low owing to the often focal and patchy cardiac involvement in sarcoidosis. New imaging techniques, such as fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, can provide valuable information for the accurate diagnosis of CS and can be useful for evaluating treatment response and prognosis. Immunosuppressive treatments, particularly corticosteroids, are considered the cornerstone of therapy for CS. However, randomized clinical trials are lacking, and treatment decisions are based on cohort studies and consensus opinions. Moreover, the optimal strategy for determining when to initiate, how long to continue, and what dosage to use for immunosuppressive therapy remains uncertain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.