Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41659106›Full record

ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026

Exploration of Anesthetic Strategies for Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Intervention.

Shuantong Lin, Yulong Guan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shuantong LinDepartment of Anesthesiology, Eastern Bund Healthcare, 202162 Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2569-7016
Yulong GuanDepartment of Extracorporeal Circulation, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, 100037 Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3609-0197

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a critical factor in the progression of right heart failure. Although conventional open surgery remains the definitive treatment, the application of this technique is significantly limited in older and high-risk patients due to frequent comorbidities, including impaired right ventricular functional reserve, pulmonary hypertension, and multi-organ dysfunction, which lead to substantially increased surgical risks. Transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI), which achieves anatomical correction through minimally invasive approaches, has emerged as an effective alternative strategy for patients deemed ineligible for surgery. During these procedures, anesthesiologists face three core challenges: susceptibility to acute changes in the preload of the right ventricle, a high risk of circulatory collapse (particularly in functional TR with right ventricular decompensation), and the precise integration of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) with hemodynamic monitoring. Consequently, anesthesiologists who become experts in the pathological staging of TR, key points of image-guided device implantation, and warning indicators of circulatory collapse can help maintain perioperative stability. Moreover, gaining a thorough understanding of the pathological progression of tricuspid valve disease, improving the assessment of right heart function, and optimizing the TTVI process and management capabilities are crucial for improving patient outcomes. Thus, establishing a perioperative anesthetic strategy focused on right heart protection may reduce cardiovascular-related complications and all-cause mortality.

Indexed as

anesthesiatranscatheter tricuspid valve interventionstricuspid regurgitation

Identifiers

PMID41659106
PMCPMC12873686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.