ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026
Electrocardiographic Characteristics of Escape Rhythm During Complete Atrioventricular Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Complete atrioventricular block (CAVB) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is primarily attributed to mechanical compression of the penetrating or branching portions of the His bundle, and less commonly, the atrioventricular (AV) node. This study aimed to characterize the electrocardiographic features of stable escape rhythms (ERs) occurring during CAVB after TAVR. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) obtained at three time points: before TAVR (ECG 1), after TAVR but before CAVB (ECG 2), and during CAVB (ECG 3). The ERs on ECG 3 were classified as AV junctional if the rate was 40-60 beats per minute (bpm) and, compared with ECG 2, if the QRS morphology matched in ≥10/12 leads, the QRS duration differed by <10 ms, and the frontal QRS axis differed by <30°. The ERs not meeting these criteria were considered ventricular in origin. Three patients with ERs <40 bpm but matching AV junctional morphology were included in the AV junctional group. ECG 2 was unavailable in 12 patients. Results: Among the 58 patients included, 56.9% had no conduction abnormalities on baseline ECG 1. Following TAVR (ECG 2), left and right bundle branch blocks were observed in 69.6% and 17.4% of the patients, respectively. During CAVB (ECG 3), the ERs were presumed to originate from the AV junction in 23 patients (39.6%), from the ventricles in 28 (48.3%), and had an undetermined origin in 7 (12.1%). Conclusions: Consistent with the anatomical regions commonly affected by the prosthetic aortic valve during TAVR, a substantial proportion of patients exhibited ERs likely originating from the AV junction, suggesting a potential role for conduction system pacing in managing CAVB in this setting of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.