SynthesisReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026
The Impact of Pre-Operative Aneurysm Diameter on Mortality After Standard and Complex Endovascular Aortic Repair.
Synthesis in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Various anatomical factors have been related to mortality after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). This systematic review investigated the impact of the pre-operative maximum aortic aneurysm diameter on mortality after standard and complex EVAR. Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to search the MEDLINE, EMBASE, via Ovid and CENTRAL databases, until 31st July 2025. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies were eligible if they were published between 2015 and 2025 and reported on the association of the pre-operative maximum aortic aneurysm diameter with a 30-day and midterm mortality follow-up in standard and complex EVAR patients. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale assessed the risk of bias. The primary outcome was the impact of the pre-operative maximum aortic aneurysm diameter on 30-day mortality after standard and complex EVAR. Results: From 1182 studies, 25 were included; 19 reporting on standard (130,476) patients and six on complex EVAR (14,097) patients. A significant heterogeneity in terms of maximum pre-operative aortic aneurysm diameter threshold to identify larger aneurysms was detected. Regarding standard EVAR, eight studies evaluated the impact of the pre-operative maximum abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) diameter on 30-day mortality (smaller: 0.3-13.2% vs. larger: 0.7-20.8%) with conflicting outcomes. Four studies (4/8 studies; 50%) concluded that a larger diameter was related to higher 30-day mortality in patients with standard EVAR, while four showed no statistical significance. Two out of five standard EVAR studies that investigated the pre-operative AAA diameter as an independent predictor for 30-day mortality confirmed this finding. During the mid-term follow-up, ten studies showed that the pre-operative maximum AAA diameter was independently related to mortality after standard EVAR. In complex EVAR, four out of six studies showed that the 30-day mortality was higher (smaller: 0.5-7.0% vs. larger: 4.0-15.0%) in larger aortic aneurysms, including juxta-, para-, supra-renal, and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Four out of five (80.0%) studies showed that a larger diameter was an independent predictor for follow-up mortality after complex EVAR. Conclusions: The pre-operative aortic aneurysm diameter seems to be related to mortality after standard or complex EVAR. However, the impact of the pre-operative aortic aneurysm diameter on mortality seems to be more prominent in complex EVAR cases, with 80% of studies confirming this finding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.