Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41659086›Full record

ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026

From Last Resort to Standard of Care: The Evolution and Future of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Oliver Lee, Ahmed Osman, Dominique Shum-Tim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Oliver LeeUCL Medical School, University College London, WC1E 6BT London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7141-0689
Ahmed OsmanFaculté de Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1J7, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8621-1168
Dominique Shum-TimDivision of Cardiac Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H3A 1A3, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8356-4826

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has evolved from an experimental, last-resort procedure in 2002 to a first-line therapy for aortic stenosis; moreover, the 2025 ESC/EACTS (European Society of Cardiology/European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgeons) guidelines marked a paradigm shift beyond traditional risk stratification toward earlier intervention and broader patient selection. Current evidence demonstrates the non-inferiority or superiority of TAVI to surgical aortic valve replacement across all risk categories, with the guidelines now recommending TAVI for patients aged ≥70 years and formally endorsing early intervention in asymptomatic severe stenosis when procedural risk is low. Meanwhile, critical challenges persist despite large-scale systematic reviews demonstrating significant mortality reduction following TAVI, including paravalvular leak rates of 10-25% compared to near-zero rates with surgery, and subclinical leaflet thrombosis affecting up to 30% of patients with unclear optimal management strategies. Moreover, the expansion toward younger populations exposes critical knowledge gaps, including unknown long-term durability beyond 10 years, structural valve degeneration rates of 4.8-13.3% at 5-7 years, and complex reintervention scenarios with reported mortality rates of 17.1% for surgical TAVI explantation. Thus, this review synthesizes contemporary evidence within the framework of the 2025 guidelines while examining unique aspects, including the pathophysiology of subclinical leaflet thrombosis, polymeric heart valve technologies as next-generation solutions, and the critical durability questions that will determine the role of TAVI in younger patients. Next-generation polymeric valves utilizing materials such as polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes-polycarbonate urethane (POSS-PCU), poly(styrene-b-isobutylene-b-styrene) (SIBS), and siloxane polyurethane-urea have shown promising preclinical results in terms of enhanced durability and reduced thrombogenicity, although comprehensive clinical validation remains necessary. As TAVI practice evolves under new guideline recommendations emphasizing early intervention and simplified antithrombotic management, this thorough analysis can provide essential context for understanding both current capabilities and future directions in transcatheter valve therapy.

Indexed as

aortic valve stenosisminimally invasive cardiac surgerystructural valve degenerationtranscatheter aortic valve implantationtranscatheter aortic valve replacement

Identifiers

PMID41659086
PMCPMC12873687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.