ArticleDigital health
Gender-specific classification of subclinical liver and renal dysfunction in older adults using machine learning and cytokine profiling.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study leverages machine learning and cytokine profiles to differentiate liver and renal function abnormalities in the aging population, aiming for advancements in early detection techniques. Methods: The analysis involved data from 760 participants, employing logistic regression, random forest, lasso regression, extreme gradient boosting, and support vector machines to create diagnostic models. Cytokine levels were measured via ELISA, alongside liver and renal clinical function tests. The data were randomly split 3:1 into training and hold-out validation sets; Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) was applied exclusively to the training set to mitigate class imbalance. Models were assessed on precision, recall, F1 score, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC). Results: Lasso regression was notably effective in identifying renal function abnormalities, delivering AUCs of 0.895 for males and 0.940 for females, pointing to its robustness in feature selection and model accuracy. For liver function, logistic regression was most accurate, with AUCs of 0.918 for males and 0.794 for females, identifying VCAM-1, REG4, Thrombomodulin, Notch-3 for males, and GDF-15, LDL R, CA125, PON1 for females as key discriminative cytokines. These results illustrate the models' capability in discerning critical biomarkers for early detection, with performance improved by SMOTE through correction of class imbalance in the training data. Conclusion: Integrating machine learning with cytokine profiling emerges as a highly promising method for early detection of liver and renal abnormalities in the aging population, suggesting significant potential for improving preventive healthcare outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.