Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41659052›Full record

ArticleDigital health

A flexible wearable system for uterine contraction monitoring and admission decision support.

Xin Xu, Li Gong, Ji-Chao Leng, Li-Hua Xu, Huan Liang, Zhuo Zou, Yan Ding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xin XuSchool of Nursing, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4253-618X
Li GongCollege of Future Information Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7703-0978
Ji-Chao LengCollege of Future Information Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3624-1274
Li-Hua XuObstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai Key Lab of Reproduction and Development, Shanghai Key Lab of Female Reproductive Endocrine Related Diseases, Shanghai, China.
Huan LiangObstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai Key Lab of Reproduction and Development, Shanghai Key Lab of Female Reproductive Endocrine Related Diseases, Shanghai, China.
Zhuo ZouCollege of Future Information Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yan DingObstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai Key Lab of Reproduction and Development, Shanghai Key Lab of Female Reproductive Endocrine Related Diseases, Clinical Research Unit (CRU), Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1779-6837

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Uterine contraction is a meaningful indicator for labor onset and appropriate hospital admission. Inaccurate self-assessment may lead to premature admission, unnecessary interventions, and higher healthcare resource use. Traditional monitoring devices have limited portability and comfort, restricting home-based use. Objective: This study developed and validated a wearable system integrating flexible sensors, a data acquisition platform, and machine learning models to monitor uterine contractions and identify labor onset, focusing on late pregnancy and the pre-labor period. Methods: A flexible sensor-based device was developed and validated against hospital toco. Contraction data from 82 participants (104 recordings) were preprocessed and segmented, and features were extracted for model training. Hospital admission was classified into recommended admission (RA), deferred admission (DA), and selective admission (SA). Several ML models were trained and evaluated via 10-fold stratified cross-validation using accuracy, precision, recall, Results: A total of 82 participants were enrolled, and 104 uterine contraction recordings were collected, ranging from 10 to 70 min (mean 20.3). Two hundred and seventy-seven processed segments were obtained for analysis. Contraction signals were generally consistent with toco measurements ( Conclusion: The system enabled accurate monitoring of uterine contractions, improved estimation of hospital admission timing, reduced premature admission risk, and demonstrated high wearability, offering a feasible solution for home obstetric monitoring.

Indexed as

digital systemmachine learningmedical decision-makingonset of laboruterine contractionsWearable devices

Identifiers

PMID41659052
PMCPMC12873095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.