Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41659048›Full record

ArticleJugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong2026

Introduction to the Revised Standard Operating Procedures of the Institutional Review Board at the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency.

So Yeon Park, Ji Min Lim, Soon Young Son, Eun Kyo Kwak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Jugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

So Yeon ParkDivision of Biomedical Research Institution, Department of Research Planning and Coordination, National Institute of Health, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4463-4868
Ji Min LimDivision of Biomedical Research Institution, Department of Research Planning and Coordination, National Institute of Health, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7771-6263
Soon Young SonDivision of Biomedical Research Institution, Department of Research Planning and Coordination, National Institute of Health, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8653-9489
Eun Kyo KwakDivision of Biomedical Research Institution, Department of Research Planning and Coordination, National Institute of Health, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1062-8464

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To introduce the revised standard operating procedures (SOPs) of the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA) Institutional Review Board (IRB) and provide practical guidance to support researchers in complying with bioethics regulations and efficiently submitting review applications. Methods: Based on the Bioethics and Safety Act and its enforcement regulations, we systematically organized the key contents of the revised SOPs, including IRB composition, review types and procedures, required documents, and important considerations for researchers. Results: The KDCA IRB played a crucial role in reviewing the research protocols before study implementation to ensure the protection of research participants' rights and welfare as the highest priority. The 2025 revised guidelines systematically specify the IRB composition and authority, clarify review types and procedures, and establish a Data Subcommittee to address ethical issues in big data and artificial intelligence research. Three types of reviews were conducted based on the risk level and characteristics of the research: regular, expedited, and exempt reviews. All the review processes were integrated using the e-IRB system. Conclusions: The revised SOPs incorporated additional provisions for the systematic operation of the KDCA IRB and included detailed practical information to assist researchers in submitting and proceeding with IRB applications. This establishes a foundation for supporting researchers' compliance with bioethics regulations and effectively responding to the evolving research environment.

Indexed as

BioethicsInstitutional Review BoardPeer review, researchStandard operating procedures

Identifiers

PMID41659048
PMCPMC12873684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.