Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41659031›Full record

ReviewJournal of pharmaceutical analysis2026

Targeted nano-drug delivery systems for tumor immunotherapy.

Shan Lian, Wenyong Yang, Yan Zeng, Ranran Tang, Kui Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pharmaceutical analysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shan LianWest China School of Basic Medical Sciences & Forensic Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Wenyong YangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Research Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Jiaotong University, The Second Chengdu Hospital Affiliated to Chongqing Medical University, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Yan ZengWest China School of Basic Medical Sciences & Forensic Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Ranran TangNanjing Women and Children's Healthcare Institute, Women's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Nanjing Women and Children's Healthcare Hospital), Nanjing, 210004, China.
Kui WangWest China School of Basic Medical Sciences & Forensic Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While being a safe and effective precision therapy strategy, tumor immunotherapy still fails in many patients due to the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Emerging evidence has indicated that the targeted nano-drug delivery systems can accurately deliver therapeutic agents to potentiate the efficacy of immunotherapy. This review will outline recent advances in applying targeted nano-drug delivery systems in immunotherapy, with an emphasis on their crucial roles in regulating innate immune responses, adaptive immune responses, and immunogenic cell death. We will also discuss the current challenges and future opportunities for the clinical translation of targeted nano-drug delivery systems for tumor immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Adaptive immunityImmunogenic cell deathImmunotherapyInnate immunityTargeted nano-drug delivery systemsTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID41659031
PMCPMC12874421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.