ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
Segmental bioimpedance and anthropometry improve machine learning prediction of grip strength in healthy young adults.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Accurate, non-invasive assessment of muscle strength remains a key challenge for functional health monitoring and wearable systems. This study investigates whether segmental bioimpedance (BioZ) and anthropometry measurements from the wrist and forearm can predict hand grip strength (HGS) in healthy young adults, and characterizes how measurement site, frequency, and applied pressure influence BioZ signal behavior, which are critical factors for translating BioZ into wearable applications. Methods: We recruited twenty healthy young adults who underwent standardized HGS testing alongside segmental BioZ measurements at the wrist and forearm using a bipolar electrode configuration. Anthropometric variables including age, height, body mass, and limb circumference were recorded. Nonparametric statistical analyses were used to examine anatomical site-specific differences and associations among BioZ, circumference, and HGS. Multiple linear regression (MLR) and random forest (RF) regression models were developed to estimate HGS from anthropometric and localized BioZ features and evaluated using leave-one-out cross validation. In addition, exploratory single-subject experiments were conducted to assess BioZ responses to varying frequency, applied pressure, and electrode configuration at both anatomical sites. Results: At the cohort level, forearm BioZ values were higher than wrist BioZ (p = 0.0001) and inversely correlated with forearm circumference (ρ = -0.54, p = 0.014). Forearm circumference showed the strongest positive association with HGS, while forearm BioZ exhibited a moderate inverse association. Incorporating localized forearm BioZ into baseline improved predictive performance (RF regression: R Conclusion: This pilot study demonstrates that localized, size-normalized forearm BioZ provides physiologically complementary information to basic anthropometry for estimating HGS in healthy young adults. By integrating cohort-level modeling with exploratory mechanistic experiments, the findings provide insight into the anatomical and mechanical determinants of localized BioZ behavior. This supports the potential utility of combining experimental and computational approaches to inform the future development of next-generation BioZ-based wearable systems for non-invasive assessment of muscle strength, rehabilitation progress, and early signs of muscular decline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.