ArticleConservation physiology2026
Effects of a high-power laser eye exposure on avian foraging behaviour: implications for the safety of laser bird deterrents.
Article in Conservation physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To prevent human-bird conflict, lasers have been developed as nonlethal wildlife control methods despite being known to cause eye injury in humans. However, little is known about how much laser exposure can affect visually driven activities critical for survival, such as foraging. We assessed how laser exposure and its output energy affected avian visual exploratory behaviour during foraging and food consumption. We exposed house sparrows to a high-energy laser (Seabird Saver) under controlled conditions and measured within Week 1 after exposure and within Week 2 after exposure their foraging behaviour when visually locating millet seeds against a high contrast (easy task) and low contrast (difficult task) background. We found that house sparrows arrived at the food patch quicker and decreased their use of binocular vision within Week 1 after exposure compared to before exposure. Within Week 1 and within Week 2 after exposure, birds changed their rates of scanning depending on the difficulty of the foraging task. They also developed laterality by increasing foveal (i.e. high acuity) visual exploration rate using more the left compared to the right eye, particularly with increasing laser energy levels. Laser exposure increased pecking rates and seed consumption rates both within Week 1 and within Week 2 after exposure. This result is consistent with variations in body mass, which decreased markedly right after laser exposure, but animals recovered their pre-exposure weight over a few days. Our findings suggest that exposure to a high-energy laser (Seabird Saver) can alter visual exploratory behaviour in the context of foraging and influence foraging effort and food consumption rates. We discuss the implications for the use of lasers as wild bird deterrents at airports, landfills, fisheries, etc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.