ArticleJTCVS techniques2026
Hybrid robotic mitral valve surgery with staged percutaneous coronary intervention for degenerative mitral regurgitation and coronary artery disease.
Article in JTCVS techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Some patients with degenerative mitral valve regurgitation have incidental coronary artery disease. When these patients are referred to our robotic cardiac surgery program, they are offered robotic mitral valve surgery combined with staged percutaneous coronary intervention performed during the same hospital admission. The objective of this study is to compare this new "hybrid" approach with the "conventional" operation consisting of sternotomy mitral valve surgery with coronary artery bypass grafting performed as a single procedure. Methods: Between 2011 and 2024, 181 consecutive patients with degenerative mitral valve regurgitation and coronary artery disease underwent hybrid robotic mitral valve surgery + percutaneous coronary intervention (n = 79) or conventional sternotomy mitral valve surgery + coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 102) at a single high-volume quaternary care center. Information was prospectively entered into Society of Thoracic Surgeons, regional, and institutional data collection instruments. Survival was obtained from a National Death Index. Results: Significant mitral annular calcification (requiring en bloc excision and patch reconstruction) was more frequent in the hybrid group (7.6% [6/79] vs 2.0% [2/102], Conclusions: For patients with degenerative mitral valve regurgitation and coronary artery disease, a hybrid approach (robotic mitral valve surgery + percutaneous coronary intervention) provided enhanced postoperative outcomes with short- and mid-term survival comparable to the conventional operation (sternotomy mitral valve surgery + coronary artery bypass grafting).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.