ReviewCureus2026
Intravenous Vitamin C in Severe Sepsis: A Systematic Review of Evidence From 2020 to 2025.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting integrated cell death networks in sepsis‑associated acute kidney injury: Shared regulatory nodes and diet‑related small molecule modulation (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Vitamin C as a Potential Geroprotector: Interactions with Aging Hallmarks and Implications for Healthy Longevity.Nutrients · 2026Review
- High-Dose Intravenous Vitamin C in Critical Illness: A Translational Exposure-Response Framework for Biomarker-Guided Precision Therapy.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, with high mortality despite advances in standard care. Intravenous (IV) vitamin C has been proposed as an adjunctive therapy due to its antioxidant, endothelial-stabilizing, and catecholamine-sparing properties, which may improve organ function and reduce vasopressor requirements. This systematic review evaluates evidence from 2020 to 2025 on IV vitamin C in adult patients with sepsis or septic shock. Five studies, including randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and meta-analyses, were included. Results indicate modest physiological benefits, such as transient reductions in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores and vasopressor duration, but consistent improvement in mortality, ICU stay, or hospital length of stay remains unproven. Variability in outcomes is influenced by dosing regimens, timing of administration, patient severity, and cointerventions. Early administration, particularly within 6 h of sepsis recognition, may enhance physiological effects, while delayed therapy appears less effective. Adverse effects, including oxalate nephropathy, highlight the need for careful monitoring. Overall, IV vitamin C may serve as a supportive adjunct in sepsis management, but robust, large-scale trials are needed to clarify its clinical efficacy, optimal dosing, safety, and patient selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.