ArticleCureus2026
Post-cholecystectomy Changes in the Common Bile Duct Diameter: A Comparative Ultrasound Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Dilatation of the common bile duct (CBD) after cholecystectomy is frequently observed during follow-up imaging; however, its extent and clinical implications remain incompletely defined. Distinguishing physiological postoperative ductal enlargement from pathological dilatation is essential to avoid unnecessary diagnostic evaluation. This study aimed to compare CBD diameter in post-cholecystectomy patients with non-operated controls and to assess its association with time since surgery, age, and body mass index (BMI). Materials and methods This retrospective observational study included 165 adult patients who underwent abdominal ultrasound examination, comprising 91 post-cholecystectomy patients and 74 controls with an intact gallbladder. The CBD diameter was measured in the suprahilar segment. Group differences were evaluated using independent t-tests and chi-square tests. Logistic and linear regression analyses were used to assess predictors of CBD dilatation and continuous diameter change. All multivariable models were adjusted for age, sex, and BMI. Results CBD diameter was significantly greater in post-cholecystectomy patients compared with controls (6.61 mm vs. 4.56 mm; p < 0.001). Dilatation ≥7 mm occurred in 38.5% of post-cholecystectomy patients versus 5.4% of controls (p < 0.001), and prior cholecystectomy remained a strong independent predictor of dilatation after adjustment (aOR = 14.583; 95% CI: 4.449-47.807). Using a fixed ≥7 mm cutoff, increasing age was associated with lower odds of categorical CBD dilatation, whereas sex and BMI were not significant predictors. Linear regression analyses demonstrated a significant positive association between CBD diameter and both time elapsed since surgery and age, indicating gradual ductal enlargement over time. Marked dilatation (>10 mm) was uncommon and did not reach statistical significance in relation to cholecystectomy. Conclusion Cholecystectomy is associated with measurable and progressive enlargement of the CBD. While CBD diameter increases gradually with advancing age and postoperative duration, categorical dilation thresholds are more strongly influenced by surgical status than by age alone. Recognition of this expected postoperative anatomical pattern may help clinicians avoid unnecessary imaging and interventions in asymptomatic patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.