ReviewCureus2026
Post-surgical Orthodontic Management Using Clear Aligners: A Systematic Review of Stability, Efficiency, and Patient Outcomes.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clear aligner therapy has gained increasing attention as an alternative to fixed appliances in surgical-orthodontic treatment, particularly during the critical post-surgical phase. This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of clear aligners in post-surgical orthodontic management, focusing on skeletal and dental stability, treatment efficiency, and patient-centered outcomes. A comprehensive search of PubMed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library identified 10 eligible studies involving 258 patients. Owing to substantial heterogeneity in surgical procedures, aligner protocols, outcome measures, and follow-up durations, a meta-analysis was not feasible; therefore, findings were synthesized narratively. Across the included studies, skeletal and dental stability achieved with clear aligners was comparable to outcomes achieved with fixed appliances, with no significant differences in short-term relapse. Several studies reported improved treatment efficiency, including reduced overall treatment duration in surgery-first protocols and fewer clinical appointments during pre-surgical preparation. Patient-centered outcomes consistently favored clear aligners, with randomized trials demonstrating better periodontal health, reduced discomfort, and improved quality of life compared with fixed appliances. Perioperative outcomes were similar between groups, indicating the safety of incorporating aligners into orthognathic workflows. Despite promising results, the evidence remains limited by heterogeneity and a lack of long-term, controlled studies. Clear aligners represent an effective and patient-friendly alternative in post-surgical orthodontic management, offering comparable clinical outcomes with potential advantages in comfort, efficiency, and periodontal health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.