ArticleCureus2026
First Retrospective Analysis of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Results in Uruguay.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background In Uruguay, prostate cancer is currently the most frequently diagnosed cancer in males and the second leading cause of cancer death. However, the mortality rate has been decreasing due to early diagnosis and treatment. Robotic surgery has played a very important role in the surgical treatment of prostate cancer, becoming the gold standard approach in different countries of the world. Only one robotic platform has been available in Uruguay since 2011. This study aimed to evaluate the perioperative, oncologic, and functional outcomes of the initial experience with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in Uruguay, and to contextualize these results within internationally reported outcomes. Methodology This retrospective study analyzed outcomes of 70 patients who underwent radical robotic prostatectomy performed by a single surgeon during the initial phase of his robotic learning curve, defined as the first 70 consecutive cases performed under direct supervision by a certified proctor between March 2015 and December 2022. Results We report perioperative data, pathological findings, functional and oncological outcomes, and complications. The pathology report showed a 22.85% positive margin rate (11.11% of pT2 and 44% of pT3). The mean follow-up was 38 months. Complete continence was achieved in 93.54% of cases and potency in 66.12%. The conversion rate to open surgery was 1.42%, and Clavien grade III complications occurred in 4.2% of cases. Biochemical recurrence was observed in 19.35% of patients. Patients with positive margins and pT3 disease had significantly higher biochemical recurrence rates, and Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a restricted mean biochemical recurrence-free survival of 50.7 months (95% confidence interval = 45.9-55.5). Conclusions Our functional and oncological outcomes and complication rates appear to be within the range reported in the international literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.