ArticleCureus2026
Management of Recurrent Undescended Testis: An Observational Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRecurrent undescended testis (UDT) may result from the failure of the orchiopexy. Despite the high success rate of primary orchiopexy, complications may still occur. This study presents our experience of managing recurrent UDT. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective observational study was conducted from January 2015 to January 2025. The hospital records of all patients presenting with recurrent UDT were reviewed and analyzed. Data were extracted from patient files, operative registers, and electronic medical records. The parameters assessed included demographic characteristics, details of prior orchiopexy, intraoperative findings during redo surgery, and postoperative outcomes on follow-up.
resultsDuring the 10-year study period, 558 orchiopexies were performed. Of these, seven (1.25%) were redo orchiopexies. Five of these were operated on elsewhere -three by pediatric surgeons and two by general surgeons. The mean age of the patients was 7.6 years. All patients had a testis in the inguinal canal. In follow-up, testicular atrophy was noted in one patient. The testicular size appeared to be smaller compared to the opposite testis in five patients. Conclusion: Recurrent UDT, although uncommon, poses a significant surgical challenge. Identifying the etiological factors, if present, is imperative. Successful management depends on careful dissection, preservation of vascular integrity, and tension-free subdartos placement of the testis. The overall outcome appears to be good in the hands of experienced professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.