ArticleCureus2026
Compliance With Triage Protocols in the Emergency Department: A Retrospective Audit.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Triage is a critical component of emergency department (ED) operations, ensuring that patients are prioritized according to the severity of their condition. Objective This study aims to evaluate compliance with standardized triage protocols in a tertiary care ED and to determine the frequency of under-triage and over-triage in relation to patient characteristics and time of presentation. Materials and methods This retrospective observational study was conducted at Shalamar Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, from March 2022 to March 2025. Medical records of 135 patients presenting to the ED during the study period were reviewed. Data collected included demographics, presenting complaints, assigned triage categories, and compliance with institutional triage guidelines. Compliance was defined as adherence to standardized triage criteria, while deviations were categorized as under-triage or over-triage. Associations between compliance and patient characteristics were assessed using Pearson's chi-square test, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results The mean age of patients was 42.6 ± 18.3 years, with 83 (61.5%) males and 52 (38.5%) females. Medical presentations were most frequent (62.2%), followed by surgical (23.7%) and trauma-related (14.1%) cases. Overall compliance with triage protocols was 75.6% (102/135 cases), while 24.4% (33/135 cases) were non-compliant. Among non-compliant cases, 21 (15.6%) were under-triaged and 12 (8.9%) over-triaged. Compliance was highest among Category I patients (86.4%) and lowest among Category III patients (69.2%). Significant associations were observed between compliance and both triage category (χ² = 5.56, p = 0.04) and time of presentation (χ² = 4.71, p = 0.03), with lower compliance during peak hours. Conclusions Compliance with triage protocols in the ED was moderately high but suboptimal, with nearly one-fourth of patients triaged incorrectly. Under-triage was more common, representing a significant safety concern. Compliance was significantly influenced by triage category and time of presentation, highlighting the need for staff training, system support, and workload management to improve triage accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.