ArticleCureus2026
Electronic Documentation Practice and Its Correlated Factors Among Medical-Surgical Nurses in Selected Hospitals in Texas, USA.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionNursing documentation provides evidence of the care delivered by clearly accounting for what occurred and when it occurred. Despite the overall importance of electronic documentation, available evidence shows significant limitations in good practice.
objectiveThis study aimed to describe the electronic documentation practice and its correlated factors among medical and surgical ward nurses in four selected hospitals in Texas, USA.
methodsThe descriptive correlational study involved 379 medical-surgical nurses recruited through proportionate non-probability sampling from four hospitals in Texas, USA, with the intent of examining how socio-demographic, knowledge, attitude, and organizational factors influence electronic documentation practices. Data collected through an online questionnaire were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Spearman rho correlation, and linear regression to determine relationships and factors associated with documentation practices. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Most respondents were female (244, 64.4%), married (186, 49.1%), held a bachelor's degree (289, 76.3%), and were employed in general hospitals (254, 69%) and medical wards (290, 76.5%) for an average of 9.77 years (SD±8.51). All nurses exhibited good knowledge in areas of communication, legal protection, and patient safety, and the majority (369, 97.4%) demonstrated a favorable attitude toward the legal and clinical significance of electronic documentation. Documentation practices were strong in recording assessments, interventions, and medication administration, while lower mean scores were noted in documenting nursing diagnoses, patient education, and immediate post-care entries. Institutional supports included in-service training, operational standards, available documentation materials, and supervisory follow-up. However, more than 80% (318) reported fatigue and exhaustion, and fewer than 20% (64) indicated a lack of time and motivation for electronic documentation. Documentation practices were positively associated with educational attainment, knowledge, attitude, and organizational support (p < .01), while gender, age, income, hospital type, and years of experience showed no statistically significant correlation. Divorced nurses had poorer documentation scores compared to other marital groups. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS: High knowledge and favorable attitude, when supported by strong organizational systems, contribute to good documentation practices among nurses. The study recommends strengthening in-service training, addressing work-related fatigue, enhancing supervisory support and monitoring, and promoting timely documentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.