Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41658640›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Improving Documentation of Bowel Movements Using the Bristol Stool Chart: A Quality Improvement Project in a District General Hospital in the United Kingdom.

Sahar Yaseen, Fatema Kamaleldien Mohamed Abuelass

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sahar YaseenInternal Medicine, Royal Blackburn Teaching Hospital, Blackburn, GBR.
Fatema Kamaleldien Mohamed AbuelassRenal Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background  Patient-centred care is a fundamental aspect of the NHS. As healthcare professionals, we tailor the care plan to each patient's individual needs, ensuring a patient-centred approach. An often overlooked aspect of this care plan is the documentation of bowel movements. This is a vital part of patient care, whether patients are elderly or young and independent in their activities of daily living (ADLs). Failure to document bowel movements can lead to misdiagnosis and worsening of conditions such as constipation and diarrhoea. This may potentially prolong hospital admission. The Bristol Stool Chart is a valuable guide for healthcare professionals in differentiating stool types. Correct and consistent documentation allows early intervention, whether that involves prescribing or stopping laxatives, sending a stool sample for culture and sensitivity, or placing the patient in a side room to prevent the spread of infection. Aim This Quality Improvement Project (QIP) aims to enhance patient care by improving the documentation of bowel movements using the Bristol Stool Chart in patients admitted to the hospital. The aim is to assess the quality and consistency of bowel movement documentation in 30 patients on the Endocrine and Diabetes ward; determine compliance with documentation standards; identify gaps in recordings; identify reasons why bowel movements are not recorded; and recommend improvements. The primary aim of this QIP was to enhance patient care by enabling prompt and appropriate treatment, preventing deterioration, and avoiding unnecessary prolonged hospital admission due to unresolved bowel issues. Methodology This is a retrospective study that involved 30 patients admitted to the Endocrine and Diabetes ward in a District General Hospital. Patients were selected randomly, independent of age and sex, from the electronic patient records. The QIP was designed using a Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle and was conducted over a three-month period. Patients were selected using a set of inclusion and exclusion criteria. We included patients who had a hospital stay greater than 3 days and excluded patients who were on the end-of-life (EOL) pathway or had incomplete documentation due to transfer or early discharge. Data were collected before and after the interventions to allow us to measure the efficacy of the intervention. The interventions used were posters to remind nursing staff to document bowel movements on the electronic patient chart using the Bristol Stool Chart. Staff were advised to include bowel movement documentation as a standard step in the handover checklist between shifts and to include it in the daily nursing care bundles. Results After implementing the interventions, significant improvements were seen in bowel documentation. Daily bowel movement documentation increased from 27% to 73%, and Bristol Stool Chart use improved from 57% to 87%. Stool frequency documentation doubled from 30% to 60%. Clinical actions decreased slightly, from 45% to 39%. Correct chart format use improved from 47% to 87%, and stool consistency documentation rose from 50% to 87%, indicating enhanced care and monitoring. Conclusion Overall, simple interventions resulted in significant improvement in documentation. Consistent documentation enables early intervention and helps prevent patient deterioration, as well as delays in discharge.

Indexed as

bowel habitsbristol stool chartclinical documentation auditclinical documentation improvementinpatient careprevent complicationsquality improvement project (qip)

Identifiers

PMID41658640
PMCPMC12874475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.