Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41658614›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Multimodal data for predictive medicine: algorithmic fusion of clinical data in anesthesiology and intensive care.

Sebastian Daniel Boie, Niklas Giesa, Maria Sekutowicz, Rustam Zhumagambetov, Stefan Haufe, Elias Grünewald, Felix Balzer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. AI-assisted multimodal data integration for precision oncology.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sebastian Daniel BoieInstitute of Medical Informatics, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Niklas GiesaInstitute of Medical Informatics, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Maria SekutowiczInstitute of Medical Informatics, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Rustam ZhumagambetovPhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Berlin, Germany.
Stefan HaufeInstitute of Medical Informatics, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Elias GrünewaldInstitute of Medical Informatics, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Felix BalzerInstitute of Medical Informatics, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anesthesiology and intensive care medicine are among the most data-rich fields of medicine, where accurate and timely outcome prediction or risk stratification is important. During patient care, heterogeneous data streams, including structured electronic health records, free-text documentation, and high-frequency physiologic time series are recorded. This provides a fertile ground for machine learning (ML) models to make individualized risk predictions. Yet, secondary use of routine data remains difficult due to heterogeneity, missingness, variable granularity, ambiguously defined outcomes, or poor representation of clinical concepts in routine data. Reproducibility and transparency are difficult to achieve with hospital-specific complex data pipelines. New complexities arise when combining different data modalities. This perspective article discusses three common modalities-tabular data, clinical text, and time series-and outlines data modality-specific challenges, data preprocessing strategies, and ML modeling approaches. We examine multimodal fusion strategies through the common taxonomy of early, intermediate, and late fusion. In early fusion, generated features are aggregated into a unified tabular representation, offering simplicity and often serve as first baseline prediction models. Intermediate fusion uses modality-specific encoders with shared layers to learn cross-modal dependencies. This strategy yields the most complex and powerful models. Late decision-level fusion combines outputs from modality-optimized models, providing modularity and robustness to missing modalities, leading to advantages for real-time deployment where data arrive asynchronously. The growth of multi-centric datasets and federated infrastructures may enable intermediate-fusion architectures and multimodal foundation models to better capture patient trajectories, supporting risk stratification and personalized therapy in perioperative and intensive care settings.

Indexed as

anesthesiology and intensive careartificial intelligencedata science & machine learningmachine learning (ML)multimodal data fusion

Identifiers

PMID41658614
PMCPMC12876225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.