ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Multimodal data for predictive medicine: algorithmic fusion of clinical data in anesthesiology and intensive care.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning and Cardiovascular Diseases: An Updated Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- AI-assisted multimodal data integration for precision oncology.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anesthesiology and intensive care medicine are among the most data-rich fields of medicine, where accurate and timely outcome prediction or risk stratification is important. During patient care, heterogeneous data streams, including structured electronic health records, free-text documentation, and high-frequency physiologic time series are recorded. This provides a fertile ground for machine learning (ML) models to make individualized risk predictions. Yet, secondary use of routine data remains difficult due to heterogeneity, missingness, variable granularity, ambiguously defined outcomes, or poor representation of clinical concepts in routine data. Reproducibility and transparency are difficult to achieve with hospital-specific complex data pipelines. New complexities arise when combining different data modalities. This perspective article discusses three common modalities-tabular data, clinical text, and time series-and outlines data modality-specific challenges, data preprocessing strategies, and ML modeling approaches. We examine multimodal fusion strategies through the common taxonomy of early, intermediate, and late fusion. In early fusion, generated features are aggregated into a unified tabular representation, offering simplicity and often serve as first baseline prediction models. Intermediate fusion uses modality-specific encoders with shared layers to learn cross-modal dependencies. This strategy yields the most complex and powerful models. Late decision-level fusion combines outputs from modality-optimized models, providing modularity and robustness to missing modalities, leading to advantages for real-time deployment where data arrive asynchronously. The growth of multi-centric datasets and federated infrastructures may enable intermediate-fusion architectures and multimodal foundation models to better capture patient trajectories, supporting risk stratification and personalized therapy in perioperative and intensive care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.