ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
CT-based machine learning radiomics modeling to screen for lumbar spine osteoporosis.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Undiagnosed osteoporosis before spinal surgery increases severe complication risks. This study develops the machine learning-based CT radiomics model to preoperatively screen lumbar osteoporosis. Materials and methods: This retrospective study enrolled 166 patients undergoing concurrent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), spinal CT and MRI. Vertebral data from normal and osteoporotic cases were partitioned into training and validation cohorts (8:2 ratio). A total of 851 radiomics features were extracted from lumbar spine CT scans using the 3D slicer PyRadiomics module. Feature selection employed mRMR (minimum redundancy maximum relevance) for preliminary screening followed by LASSO regression for dimensionality reduction. Four machine learning classifiers were developed: logistic regression (LR), support vector machines (SVM), XGBoost, and random forest (RF). Model performance was assessed through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with DeLong test comparisons. Clinical utility was quantified via decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: Nine radiomic features based on spine CT images were constructed to develop the model. The radiomic-XGBoost model with the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.89 of the training cohort and 0.91 of the test cohort among the machine learning algorithms. The DeLong test showed that the differences between the radiomic-XGBoost, vertebral bone quality (VBQ) and Hounsfield unit (HU) models were statistically significant ( Conclusion: CT-based machine learning radiomics significantly outperformed VBQ scoring and HU measurements in osteoporosis diagnostic accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.