Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41658583›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Cell-f identity of biomedical students: from energetic "mitochondrials" to gastronomic "lysosomics".

Teun J de Vries

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Teun J de VriesDepartment of Periodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At the start of a Molecular Cell Biology course, 66 students from the biomedical track introduced themselves by identifying with a specific cell component. On the final exam, they were asked once again to name their favorite cell component at that moment-this time providing concrete details based on what they had learned throughout the course. Remarkably, the students named no fewer than 21 distinct components. Popular choices included mitochondria (20 students), the cytoskeleton (7), and the cytoplasm and ribosome (5 each), while more unusual responses featured the flagellum and GPCR receptors. Although the question called for a scientific explanation, only 20 students provided purely scientific answers. A total of 11 students responded with purely associative descriptions, without linking their choice to biological function. The remaining 35 students offered hybrid responses, blending newly acquired cell biology knowledge with personal reflections. The students connected cellular features to broader themes such as personality, personal growth, adaptability, relationship maintenance, organizational skills, hobbies such as physical exercise, and gastronomy. These findings show that cellular features and functions evoke a wide range of associations with aspects that are important in the lives of undergraduate students.

Indexed as

bachelor educationbiomedical educationhonors college studentsmitochondriumphysical activityself-identitysense of belonging

Identifiers

PMID41658583
PMCPMC12875934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.