ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Could higher hospital spending improve survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A multicenter retrospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The hospital spending of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) have been increasing over years, imposing a heavy economic burden on these patients. However, little is known about the association between spending and their overall survival (OS). Methods: We recruited 11,037 ESCC patients who were admitted between August, 2009 and December, 2018 at the Southern Center (Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College), and between January, 2012 to December, 2017 at the Northern Center (Anyang Cancer Hospital). Spending terciles were the exposure measure, and OS was the outcome. OS in terciles 2 and 3 was compared with OS in tercile 1 (the lowest spending tercile) using Cox regression models. Analyses were stratified by TNM stage and study center. Results: Monthly hospital spending followed an "L-shaped" trend. After a maximum follow-up of 12.52 years, the median survival time was 4.70 years. Higher spending was associated with worse OS in stage 0-II patients (adjusted HR Conclusions: The findings suggest that early-stage ESCC patients may benefit from more conservative treatment approaches, whereas advanced-stage patients require comprehensive and sufficient treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.