ReviewInnovation (Cambridge (Mass.))2026
Advancing battery research through large language models: A review.
Review in Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Natural-language-processing and safety-engineering-based fault identification technique for electrochemical ESSs.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rechargeable batteries are pivotal for achieving carbon neutrality and enabling the renewable energy transition. Their advancement requires innovations at micro (materials), device (manufacturing), and system (control and optimization) levels. However, traditional trial-and-error approaches are inadequate for modern scientific demands. As a transformative artificial intelligence (AI) technology, large language models (LLMs) deliver powerful semantic understanding and reasoning capabilities, driving a paradigm shift in battery research to address multilevel innovation needs. Nevertheless, this field still faces dual challenges: ambiguous technical roadmaps and fragmented progress in stage-specific achievements. This review systematically consolidates recent advances in applying LLMs to battery research, distilling core findings across four critical domains: knowledge integration, materials discovery, manufacturing processes, and system management. To address key bottlenecks-including limited model interpretability, inadequate alignment with electrochemical mechanisms, and real-world data adaptation challenges-we propose structured frameworks for deep integration of battery research and LLMs, alongside defined future technical pathways. These frameworks bridge fundamental battery science with AI-driven innovation paradigms to facilitate groundbreaking advances in next-generation battery technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.