ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2026
Positive and non-linear association of sagittal abdominal diameter-to-height ratio with stress urinary incontinence in US women: evidence from NHANES 2011-2016.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Central obesity represents a well-established risk factor for stress urinary incontinence (SUI), with sagittal abdominal diameter-to-height ratio (SADHtR) recognized as a superior anthropometric indicator of visceral adiposity. However, the evidence between the SADHtR and SUI remains scarce. This study aimed to elucidate the association between SADHtR and SUI of adult women. Methods: This cross-sectional study incorporated 4,846 women ≥20 years from the 2011-2016 cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Multivariable-adjusted logistic and linear regression models were used to investigate the relationship between SADHtR and the prevalence and severity of SUI. Smooth curve fitting methods and a two-piecewise linear regression model were employed to examine potential nonlinear relationships. Subgroup analyses and interaction tests were performed to identify potential effect modifiers. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to balance confounders, strengthening the robustness of the findings. Results: A positive association was observed between SADHtR and both the prevalence and severity of SUI after adjusted for potential confounders [odds ratio (OR) =3.59; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.75-4.69; P<0.001] (β=0.71; 95% CI: 0.23-1.19; P=0.004). The relationship between SADHtR and the prevalence of SUI exhibited non-linear dose-response, with an inflection point at SADHtR =0.14. Subgroup analyses demonstrated consistent associations across all examined cohorts and showed that the positive relationship was more pronounced among young women. Conclusions: This study demonstrated a nonlinear positive association between SADHtR and SUI risk. Our findings establish SADHtR as a valuable anthropometric measure for SUI risk evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.