ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2026
An updated review of the SMA clinical trial landscape in the United States: Findings from analysis of recruitment targets on ClinicalTrials.gov and a survey of SMA clinical trial sites on factors affecting site capacity and readiness.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The evolving therapeutic landscape of spinal muscular atrophy - A scoping review of investigational agents, emerging delivery technologies and strategic innovations.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The approval of new disease-modifying treatments, diagnostic tools, and expansion of the drug pipeline has evolved the clinical trial landscape for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) - a rare neuromuscular disease. Nonetheless, significant unmet needs for the SMA population remain and require continued evolution of the SMA clinical trial landscape. In 2023, Cure SMA developed a series of activities to assess the current SMA clinical trial landscape including the Cure SMA Capacity and Recruitment Survey. The purpose of the survey was to understand site capacity for SMA clinical trials in the US, identify factors that may limit site trial capacity and/or readiness, and identify opportunities to increase site capacity. Twenty-four (24) sites across the US with experience in conducting SMA clinical trials are represented in the results. Although existing clinical trial sites may have the capacity to take on additional SMA trials, many factors are inhibiting efficient trial management and study start-up. As recruitment needs for SMA clinical trials continue to evolve, action is needed to address the site needs - such as increased clinical staff support and bandwidth, streamlining training, and adequate funding to conduct trials - to further optimize trial site readiness and capacity. SMA clinical trial sites, sponsors, and contract research organizations will need to work together to optimize trial site readiness address challenges to capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.