Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41658435›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2026

An updated review of the SMA clinical trial landscape in the United States: Findings from analysis of recruitment targets on ClinicalTrials.gov and a survey of SMA clinical trial sites on factors affecting site capacity and readiness.

Fatou Sarr, Ilse Peterson, Jacqueline Glascock, Mary Curry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fatou SarrFaegre Drinker Consulting, 1500 K Street NW, Suite 1100, Washington, DC, 20052, USA.
Ilse PetersonFaegre Drinker Consulting, 1500 K Street NW, Suite 1100, Washington, DC, 20052, USA.
Jacqueline GlascockCure SMA, 925 Busse Road, Elk Grove Village, IL, 60007, USA.
Mary CurryCure SMA, 925 Busse Road, Elk Grove Village, IL, 60007, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The approval of new disease-modifying treatments, diagnostic tools, and expansion of the drug pipeline has evolved the clinical trial landscape for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) - a rare neuromuscular disease. Nonetheless, significant unmet needs for the SMA population remain and require continued evolution of the SMA clinical trial landscape. In 2023, Cure SMA developed a series of activities to assess the current SMA clinical trial landscape including the Cure SMA Capacity and Recruitment Survey. The purpose of the survey was to understand site capacity for SMA clinical trials in the US, identify factors that may limit site trial capacity and/or readiness, and identify opportunities to increase site capacity. Twenty-four (24) sites across the US with experience in conducting SMA clinical trials are represented in the results. Although existing clinical trial sites may have the capacity to take on additional SMA trials, many factors are inhibiting efficient trial management and study start-up. As recruitment needs for SMA clinical trials continue to evolve, action is needed to address the site needs - such as increased clinical staff support and bandwidth, streamlining training, and adequate funding to conduct trials - to further optimize trial site readiness and capacity. SMA clinical trial sites, sponsors, and contract research organizations will need to work together to optimize trial site readiness address challenges to capacity.

Indexed as

Clinical trial capacityClinical trial optimizationClinical trial readinessRare disease clinical trialSpinal muscular atrophy

Identifiers

PMID41658435
PMCPMC12878686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.