Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41658403›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare informatics research2026

Explanation Beyond Individual Features: Instance-wise Feature Grouping for EHR Predictive Analytics.

Chin Wang Cheong, Kejing Yin, William K Cheung, Ivor Tsang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare informatics research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chin Wang CheongDepartment of Computer Science, Hong Kong Baptist University, 224 Waterloo Road, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, China.
Kejing YinDepartment of Computer Science, Hong Kong Baptist University, 224 Waterloo Road, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, China.
William K CheungDepartment of Computer Science, Hong Kong Baptist University, 224 Waterloo Road, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, China.
Ivor TsangSchool of Computer Science, University of Technology Sydney, 15 Broadway Ultimo, Sydney, New South Wales 2007 Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying relevant input features which contribute to the output of a clinical prediction model can enhance the model explainability. To allow the explainability to be more personalized, instance-wise feature selection (IWFS) methods can be adopted where features are selected specifically for each input instance. Existing IWFS methods often grapple with feature selection instability, and thus precarious interpretation. As relevant features among the instances in a dataset do overlap, feature grouping tricks have been proposed to regularize the selection, but often at the expense of sacrificing the downstream prediction accuracy. To this end, we propose a novel instance-wise feature grouping method called FlexGPC to achieve robust and stable selection by learning i) flexible representation for feature groups, and ii) flexible combination of feature groups implemented using neural networks. To evaluate the effectiveness of FlexGPC, we explore various feature group combination schemes and conduct extensive experiments for performance comparison using real-world electronic health records (EHR) data. Our experimental results show that FlexGPC outperforms all the SOTA baselines in terms of accuracy and feature selection stability for both downstream mortality and next-admission diagnosis prediction tasks. We also illustrate that computational phenotyping can be achieved at the same time, with the identified feature groups being the potential phenotypes.

Indexed as

Deep learningElectronic health recordsExplanabilityFeature selectionPredictive analytics

Identifiers

PMID41658403
PMCPMC12873021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.