ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Psychometric properties of an Arabic translation of the short form of the affective lability scale in a sample of Lebanese adults.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The present study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of an Arabic version of the Affective Lability Scale in its short form (ALS-18) within an Arabic-speaking sample. Particularly, the concurrent validity, sex invariance and factorial structure were examined. Methods: The total sample of this cross-sectional study consisted of 748 adults, with a mean age of 34.48 ± 13.25 years, 66.5% females. After completing the forward-backward translation for cultural and linguistic adaptation, concurrent validity was assessed through correlations with related constructs, Confirmatory Factor Analysis was conducted to examine the factorial structure, and internal reliability as well as measurement invariance across sex were tested, the latter being through multigroup analyses. Results: The fit of the scale's original three-factor model was suggested through confirmatory factor analyses. Full measurement invariance at the configural, metric, and scalar levels was attained. The scale also yielded concurrent validity, with results indicating associations with increased levels of depression, anxiety and stress, and lower levels of self-esteem. The study's findings further denoted good internal consistency of the Arabic ALS-18 with values of McDonald's Conclusion: Results revealed that the Arabic ALS-18 is a reliable and valid self-report measure that could be utilized among an Arabic-speaking population to assess affective lability. The availability of the Arabic version of the ALS-18 is deemed to increase its use for research and provide a foundation for future clinical validation studies, globally benefiting Arabic-speaking individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.