Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41658372›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2025

Measurement effects on critical scaling in neural systems.

M Shane Li, Benyuan Liu, Keith W van Antwerp, Eslam Abdelaleem, Audrey J Sederberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Power Laws in Empirical Eigenvalue Spectra.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M Shane LiSchool of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Benyuan LiuSchool of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Keith W van AntwerpSchool of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Eslam AbdelaleemSchool of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Audrey J SederbergSchool of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.

Funding

Investigating the microcircuit determinants of neural population activity through comparative analysis of latent dynamics across cortical areas in the mouseRF1MH130413 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI SEDERBERG, AUDREY · 2022 to 2022
$1.2M
NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH130413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recently developed phenomenological renormalization group (pRG) analysis has uncovered scale-free properties in large-scale neural population recordings across recording modalities, including extracellular electrophysiology and calcium imaging. The convergence of these properties across the datasets hints at universal neural behavior. Yet, it is unknown how differences in temporal resolution and measurement details affect pRG scaling. Here, we use a network model known to produce scaling under pRG analysis as a testbed to assess how recording and analysis choices shape inferred scaling exponents. We show that scaling properties depend on the choices of temporal binning, measurement nonlinearities, and deconvolution, and that the quality of scaling for cluster covariance eigenvalues is particularly sensitive to measurement effects. Moreover, all scaling exponents shift substantially with these transformations, even when the underlying neural dynamics are identical. Together, these results show how experimental choices can change pRG scaling and provide a framework for separating scaling driven by neural dynamics from that introduced by the recording method.

Indexed as

calcium imagingcoarse grainingelectrophysiologyneural criticalitypopulation dynamicsrenormalization group

Identifiers

PMID41658372
PMCPMC12876168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.