ArticleFood chemistry: X2026
Preparation, identification and molecular characterization of umami peptides from skipjack tuna meat: Insights from sensory evaluation and molecular dynamics simulations.
Article in Food chemistry: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antioxidant Peptides fromMarine drugs · 2026Article
- Peptide-associated taste differences and underlying molecular regulation in a red variant ofCurrent research in food science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, novel umami peptides were identified from skipjack tuna protein hydrolysates using enzymatic hydrolysis, purification, sensory evaluation, and molecular modeling. A hydrolysate with a high degree of hydrolysis was prepared using papain and flavor protease, and the most umami-active fraction was obtained through ultrafiltration and chromatographic separation. Fourteen peptides were identified, among which HAHA, QEYGGG, YD, DFDNA, DVPAE, EADH, and EYF showed lower umami thresholds than monosodium glutamate. Molecular docking and 100 ns molecular dynamics simulations revealed that DFDNA and DVPAE displayed low RMSD values, while key residues in the T1R1 and T1R3 subunits remained structurally stable. High-affinity peptides formed persistent hydrogen bonds and π interactions with the receptor complex. Short peptide length and the presence of acidic and aromatic residues were crucial for receptor recognition. Overall, these results clarify the molecular basis of umami perception and provide practical guidance for designing natural peptide-based flavor enhancers for applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.