ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
The perception of surgical valve disease patients on quality of life improvement through the care line model: a longitudinal study.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the improvement in the quality of life of surgical cardiac valve disease patients based on their perceptions at three distinct points: preoperative, immediate postoperative, and late postoperative. Background: Quality of life has been increasingly recognized as a central outcome in cardiovascular care, especially in valvular diseases. Despite the extensive international literature on postoperative recovery and favorable clinical outcomes, few studies have examined quality of life from the patient's perspective within a structured care pathway model, particularly in developing countries such as Brazil. This study contributes by assessing quality of life longitudinally and from the patient's perspective, within an interdisciplinary Care Line Model implemented at a high-complexity cardiovascular center. Methods: This retrospective, observational longitudinal study included patients with significant valvular disease undergoing surgery. These patients were assessed at three time points by the psychology team: preoperative, immediate postoperative (after discharge from the Intensive Care Unit and before hospital discharge), and late postoperative (6 months after hospital discharge). Quality of life was measured from the patients' perspective using two instruments: SF-36 and EQ-5D, as part of the surgical valve disease care model implemented at the institution. Results: Patients reported significant improvements in quality of life after surgery. The EQ-5D and EQ-VAS scores increased substantially in the late postoperative period compared to preoperative values. SF-36 domains, particularly functional capacity, vitality, pain, general health, and mental health, showed robust improvement. All analyses were based strictly on comparisons between assessment points; no assumptions of linear postoperative improvement were made. Conclusion: Valve surgery is associated with meaningful improvements in patients' perceived quality of life, especially regarding mobility, pain/discomfort, self-care, and emotional and social functioning. These findings reinforce the relevance of multidisciplinary and longitudinal follow-up and demonstrate the potential contribution of structured care pathways, such as the Surgical Valve Disease Care Line, to enhance recovery and patient-centered outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.