ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2026
Antimicrobial use and stewardship opportunities in Burkina Faso: findings from the first Global Point Prevalence Survey in eight hospitals.
Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To describe the prevalence, patterns, and quality indicators of antimicrobial use (AMU) in Burkinabe hospitals and identify priorities for stewardship. Design: Multicentre, cross-sectional point prevalence survey (PPS) following the Global Point Prevalence Survey protocol. Setting: Eight public hospitals across six cities in Burkina Faso (3 primary, 3 secondary, and 2 tertiary), February-June 2019. Participants: All inpatients present on the survey day at 8:00. Medical records were reviewed for those receiving systemic antimicrobial agents. Methods: Standardized ward- and patient-level data were collected on indications, agents, routes, and WHO AWaRe categories, alongside quality indicators (documented indication, stop/review date, guideline compliance, and targeted vs empirical therapy). Descriptive analyses compared hospital tiers. Results: Of 994 inpatients, 729 (73.3%) received ≥1 antimicrobial (range by tier: tertiary 69.7%, secondary 79.2%, primary 79.2%). Community-acquired infections accounted for 96.0% of therapeutic indications. Leading reasons were skin/soft tissue infections (12.2%), gastrointestinal infections (10.7%), and pneumonia (10.4%). Parenteral administration predominated. The most used agents were ceftriaxone (27.8%), metronidazole (15.7%), and gentamicin (9.4%). By AWaRe, Access agents comprised ∼ 50%, Watch agents ∼ 50% overall, with higher Watch use in tertiary hospitals; no Reserve antibiotics were recorded. Quality indicators were suboptimal: the indication was documented in 15.6%, the stop/review date was absent in 93.0%, and 41.1% of prescriptions were guideline-compliant. Therapy was largely empirical (98.5%). Prolonged surgical prophylaxis (>1 day) represented 86.8% of prophylaxis courses. Conclusions: Antimicrobial use (AMU) prevalence in Burkinabe hospitals is high, dominated by empirical therapy and Watch-class ceftriaxone. Deficits in prescribing quality and limited diagnostic use highlight urgent needs for context-adapted antimicrobial stewardship: enforce guideline-concordant care, curb prolonged prophylaxis and unnecessary Watch-class use, and expand affordable microbiology capacity to enable targeted therapy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.