Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41658294›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Gender disparities in childhood vaccination in India: exploring the role of son preference using NFHS-5 data.

Soumen Barik, Dewaram A Nagdeve, Alex Motes Carvalho, Mayank Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Soumen BarikDepartment of Fertility & Social Demography, International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Mumbai, India.
Dewaram A NagdeveDepartment of Fertility & Social Demography, International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Mumbai, India.
Alex Motes CarvalhoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, KAHER, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
Mayank SinghDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, KAHER, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Every child has the fundamental human right to life-saving healthcare, including vaccination. Yet in India, this right is less accessible to girls in households shaped by son preference, a deep-rooted cultural bias that devalues girl children. While immunization prevents millions of deaths each year, girls are less likely to be fully vaccinated-not due to biological need, but because of gender-based discrimination in the allocation of time and care within the home. Materials and methods: Using nationally representative data from the National Family Health Survey-5 (NFHS-5; 2019-21), we analyzed a sample of 20,899 girls aged12-23 months. Full vaccination (BCG, three doses of DPT, three doses of polio, measles) was the outcome. Maternal son preference was the key exposure. We employed a four-stage generalized linear model (GLM) with a log link to estimate adjusted relative risks, progressively controlling for child, maternal, and household variables. Fairlie decomposition analysis was conducted to quantify the extent to which these characteristics explain the observed vaccination gap between girls and boys. Results: Girls in son-preferring households had significantly lower vaccination rates (70.8% vs. 76.9%). The GLM showed a consistent negative association between son preference and vaccination across all models; however, it became non-significant (ARR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.97-1.02) after full adjustment. Fairlie decomposition analysis revealed that 84% of this gap was statistically explained by factors such as birth order (21%), antenatal care (ANC) visits (29%), and household wealth (21%), which were the largest contributors. The remaining 16% was unexplained by unmeasured cultural norms. Conclusion: Interventions should target girls of higher birth order, those in the poorest households, and those born to mothers with low education. Strategies could include leveraging antenatal care visits to deliver gender-sensitive health messaging and expanding the role of community health workers (CHWs) and Anganwadi teams for door-to-door monitoring. Closing the remaining 16% of the unexplained gap demands confronting cultural norms, ensuring that every child-regardless of birth order or family wealth-has an equal right to protection.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesVaccinationFemaleHealth SurveysHumansIndiaInfantMaleSex FactorsANC visitschildhood immunizationFairlie decompositionGLMhigher birth orderson preference

Identifiers

PMID41658294
PMCPMC12880114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.