ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Tracing the evolution of health policymaking in Saudi Arabia: a qualitative analysis of experts' opinion.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A combination of international policy adoption and local implementation strategies has historically shaped health policy development in Saudi Arabia. However, there is limited understanding of the factors driving these policy changes and the challenges encountered during implementation. Objectives: This study aims to explore the state of health policymaking in Saudi Arabia, how it is formulated, and how it has evolved over the years. Methods: This qualitative study used thematic analysis of expert interviews to identify key policy formulation and evolution themes. It analyzed expert insights from 10 semi-structured interviews with policymakers, thematically coded the data, and examined it using NVivo to uncover patterns in health policy evolution. Results: The findings indicate a shift from centralized policymaking to a more collaborative, evidence-based process. Interviewees highlighted various challenges in policy implementation, including a lack of policy governance and an insufficient policy evaluation process. Conclusion: This study underscores the importance of strengthening local policy capacity to reduce dependence on foreign experts and ensure that policies align with national needs. Additionally, establishing a centralized policy repository would improve transparency, while investing in a robust health data infrastructure would bolster evidence-based policymaking and adaptive health reforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.