Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41658269›Full record

ArticleClinical parkinsonism & related disorders2026

CSF tap test parameters and Short-Term outcomes in operated and non-operated patients with idiopathic normal pressure Hydrocephalus: A cohort study.

Sagar Poudel, Deepa Dash, Aparna Wagle Shukla, Ajay Garg, Ashish Dutt Upadhyay, Naveet Wig, Roopa Rajan, Animesh Das, Divya Mr, Manjari Tripathi and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Sagar PoudelDepartment of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Deepa DashDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
Aparna Wagle ShuklaDepartment of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
Ajay GargDepartment of Neuroimaging and Interventional Neuroradiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ashish Dutt UpadhyayDepartment of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Naveet WigDepartment of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Roopa RajanDepartment of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Animesh DasDepartment of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Divya MrDepartment of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Manjari TripathiDepartment of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Achal K SrivastavaDepartment of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
S S KaleDepartment of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Poodipedi Sarat ChandraDepartment of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ashish SuriDepartment of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Pramod K PalDepartment of Neurology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, India.
Hrishikesh KumarMovement Disorders Program, Institute of Neurosciences, Kolkata, India.
Sakoon SagguDepartment of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Deepti VibhaDepartment of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Rajesh Kumar SinghDepartment of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Jasmine PariharDepartment of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ranveer Singh JadonDepartment of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ved Prakash MeenaDepartment of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Bindu PrakashDepartment of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Arunmozhimaran ElavarasiDepartment of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Normal Pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is treated by ventriculoperitoneal shunting. The cerebrospinal fluid tap test (CSF-TT) is widely used to identify candidates for shunt surgery in idiopathic NPH (iNPH). This study aimed to compare the CSF tap test responses and 24-week functional outcomes between patients with probable iNPH who underwent surgery and those who did not. Methods: This Ambispective cohort study included 40 patients with probable iNPH, as defined by the 2019 Japanese guidelines, from 2019 to 2024. All patients underwent a large-volume CSF-TT, and they were offered surgery based on the clinico-radiologic profile. Results: Twenty-four patients underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery, and 16 did not for various reasons. No significant differences were found in the baseline or 24-hour post-CSF tap test parameters between the groups. However, at 24 weeks, 62.5% of the operated patients showed at least a 1-point improvement in mRS. In contrast, only 14.3% in the non-operated group did, indicating the beneficial role of VP shunting in NPH. Those who were operated had a 10 times higher odds (95% CI 1.6-105) of achieving at least one point improvement in mRS at 24 weeks. Interestingly, 46.7% of patients whose mRS did not improve after CSF-TT but who underwent surgery still benefited from shunting. Conclusion: Shunt surgery leads to a favorable short-term functional outcome in patients with probable iNPH. However, the CSF-TT alone lacks sufficient discriminatory power to guide surgical decisions in a cohort of patients with clinico-radiological probable iNPH. A negative tap test should not preclude surgery in patients with supportive clinical and imaging features.

Identifiers

PMID41658269
PMCPMC12874416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.