ArticleBeyoglu eye journal2025
A Novel Multimodal Large Language Model for Interpreting Image-Based Ophthalmology Case Questions: Comparative Analysis of Multiple-Choice and Open-Ended Response.
Article in Beyoglu eye journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large language models for ophthalmic examination understanding: from information extraction to clinical decision support.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Benchmarking publicly accessible large language models for high-myopia multiple-choice question generation in digital ophthalmic education and public health training.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of the study is to evaluate the performance of Claude 3.5 Sonnet, a novel multimodal large language model, in interpreting image-based ophthalmology case questions. Methods: A total of 174 image-based ophthalmology questions from a comprehensive ophthalmology education platform were analyzed by Claude 3.5 Sonnet. Each question was presented in both multiple-choice and open-ended formats. Questions were categorized into six subspecialties: Retina and uveitis; external eye and cornea; orbit and oculoplastics; neuroophthalmology; glaucoma and cataract; and strabismus, pediatric ophthalmology, and genetics. Performance was evaluated by two board-certified ophthalmologists. Results: Claude 3.5 Sonnet demonstrated an overall accuracy rate of 89.65% in multiple-choice questions and a comparable 87.93% in open-ended questions, with no statistically significant difference between formats (p=0.72). Performance showed slight variations among subspecialties, with the highest accuracy in external eye and cornea cases (95.65% in both formats) and lower accuracy in strabismus, pediatric ophthalmology, and genetics (87.50% in multiple-choice and 84.38% in open-ended). Conclusion: Claude 3.5 Sonnet showed strong capabilities in interpreting image-based ophthalmology questions across all subspecialties, with consistent performance between different question formats. These findings suggest potential applications in ophthalmology education and board examination preparation; however, validation of its utility in real-world clinical scenarios needs further evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.