ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Exploring the role of agentic AI in fostering self-efficacy, autonomy support, and self-learning motivation in higher education.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychological mechanisms of AI integration in ESL teaching: teacher self-efficacy and classroom practice in Ghanaian senior high schools.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Teacher-regulated generative AI support, student agency, and perceived learning gains in higher education: the moderating role of perceived fairness.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- A study on AI-enabled course development, AI proficiency, and first-year students' academic and psychological adjustment.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Rapid adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in learning has revolutionized learners' engagement but comprehension of psychological and technological drivers of successful AI-enabled learning remains scarce. This research investigates how students' perceived agency of AI, usefulness, ease of use, trust, autonomy supporting, and self-efficacy collectively impact students' self-learning behavior and motivation. Based on Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Social Cognitive Theory (SCT), and Self-Determination Theory (SDT) theories, our research model predicts an integrated model of motivational and behavioral processes underlying AI adoption in learning settings. Methods: We adopted and followed a quantitative research design with a structured questionnaire administered among 280 higher education students in Saudi Arabia. We applied Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) using SmartPLS 4 to analyze data. Results: Findings indicate that students' perceived agency of AI significantly predicts usefulness, ease of use, and autonomy supporting, while ease of use significantly enhances AI-enabled self-efficacy. Self-efficacy and autonomy supporting significantly impact self-learning motivation, driving self-learning behavior positively. But usefulness and trust in AI failed to influence self-efficacy directly, which reveals cultural and contextual settings. Discussion: This research adds richness to the fusion of TAM, SCT, and SDT theories in illustrating how AI's perceived autonomy and usability collectively promote self-directed learning motivation. This research also provides guidelines to educators and system designers to design AI tools that promote learner autonomous settings, usability, and confidence. Future research ought to perform longitudinal and cross-cultural validations to fine-tune theoretically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.