Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41658242›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026

Exploring the role of agentic AI in fostering self-efficacy, autonomy support, and self-learning motivation in higher education.

Jehad Alqurni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jehad AlqurniDepartment of Educational Technologies, College of Education, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Rapid adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in learning has revolutionized learners' engagement but comprehension of psychological and technological drivers of successful AI-enabled learning remains scarce. This research investigates how students' perceived agency of AI, usefulness, ease of use, trust, autonomy supporting, and self-efficacy collectively impact students' self-learning behavior and motivation. Based on Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Social Cognitive Theory (SCT), and Self-Determination Theory (SDT) theories, our research model predicts an integrated model of motivational and behavioral processes underlying AI adoption in learning settings. Methods: We adopted and followed a quantitative research design with a structured questionnaire administered among 280 higher education students in Saudi Arabia. We applied Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) using SmartPLS 4 to analyze data. Results: Findings indicate that students' perceived agency of AI significantly predicts usefulness, ease of use, and autonomy supporting, while ease of use significantly enhances AI-enabled self-efficacy. Self-efficacy and autonomy supporting significantly impact self-learning motivation, driving self-learning behavior positively. But usefulness and trust in AI failed to influence self-efficacy directly, which reveals cultural and contextual settings. Discussion: This research adds richness to the fusion of TAM, SCT, and SDT theories in illustrating how AI's perceived autonomy and usability collectively promote self-directed learning motivation. This research also provides guidelines to educators and system designers to design AI tools that promote learner autonomous settings, usability, and confidence. Future research ought to perform longitudinal and cross-cultural validations to fine-tune theoretically.

Indexed as

agentic AIartificial intelligenceautonomy supporthigher educationself-efficacyself-learning motivation

Identifiers

PMID41658242
PMCPMC12872872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.