ArticleACS omega2026
Feasibility of a Protease Activity-Based Nanosensor for Breast Cancer Screening.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early detection of any form of cancer increases the number of successful treatments, but a lack of predictive biomarkers is limiting progress as low tumor-to-background ratios cause current tumor biomarkers to miss early signs of disease. Activity-based nanosensors, sensing nanoparticles administered in a prodiagnostic form, tackle this limitation by generating synthetic biomarkers at disease sites and leveraging enzymatic turnover and urinary enrichment to amplify tumor signals that would otherwise remain hidden. We inform that successful activity-based nanosensor tumor accumulation requires more than engineered nanoparticles with size, surface charge, and shape to ease the entry into tumors and the use of tumor models known to have vasculature permeable to nanoparticles. We found that a protease activity-based nanosensor with a half-life amenable to distribution in organs did not accumulate in an invasive mammary tumor model characterized by diffusive and active transport entry of nanoparticles with sizes within our nanosensor size distribution. Moreover, nonspecific and off-target activations decreased the nanosensor half-life in blood, which further aided in lowering the entry into tumors, yielding no distinct increases in the tumor activity signal in urine. These findings prompted refinements of the current design criteria of activity-based nanosensors, pushing for the development of nanosensors that rely on more specific properties of tumor proteolytic activity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.