ArticleACS omega2026
Gel Shrinkage in Discontinuous Electrophoresis: How to Stabilize the Electrolyte Boundary in Epitachophoresis - Part 2 - Nongel Solid Support.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the first part of this study, we have examined the shrinkage of hydrophilic gels during epitachophoresis, an isotachophoresis-like discontinuous electrophoretic technique, applied to concentrate DNA samples. In the present work, we evaluated selected solid porous media (sponges, nanofibers, foamed polymers, membranes, and structured inserts) as alternative anticonvective media. All materials were assessed based on zone shape, ease of creating the boundary between the leading and trailing electrolytes, and the DNA recovery. While nanofibers and most sponges resulted in poor separation or high analyte adsorption, mechanically supported agarose gels and filtration membranes provided sharp dye zones and high DNA recovery. Foamed polymers, especially plasma-treated ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene, showed the best overall performance. Some rigid open structures (e.g., silica columns or nylon nets) demonstrated potential for large analytes but require further optimization. These results highlight key design considerations for robust, scalable epitachophoresis devices for preparative DNA concentration using solid-state stabilization media.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.