Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41658060›Full record

ArticleACS omega2026

Graphene Oxide Nanofluids for Heavy-Oil Recovery: Experimental Evaluation and Field-Scale Numerical Simulation of Recovery Potential.

Jimena Gómez-Delgado, Andres Felipe Ortiz, Javier Jaimes, Raúl Andrés Martinez-Lopez, Nicolás Santos-Santos, Enrique Mejía-Ospino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jimena Gómez-DelgadoGrupo de Investigación en Tomografía Cumputarizada para Caracterización de Yacimientos (GIT), Universidad Industrial de Santander, 680002 Bucaramanga, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6229-0005
Andres Felipe OrtizGrupo de Investigación en Tomografía Cumputarizada para Caracterización de Yacimientos (GIT), Universidad Industrial de Santander, 680002 Bucaramanga, Colombia.
Javier JaimesGrupo de Investigación en Tomografía Cumputarizada para Caracterización de Yacimientos (GIT), Universidad Industrial de Santander, 680002 Bucaramanga, Colombia.
Raúl Andrés Martinez-LopezGrupo de Investigación en Tomografía Cumputarizada para Caracterización de Yacimientos (GIT), Universidad Industrial de Santander, 680002 Bucaramanga, Colombia.
Nicolás Santos-SantosGrupo de Investigación en Tomografía Cumputarizada para Caracterización de Yacimientos (GIT), Universidad Industrial de Santander, 680002 Bucaramanga, Colombia.
Enrique Mejía-OspinoGrupo de Investigación en Tomografía Cumputarizada para Caracterización de Yacimientos (GIT), Universidad Industrial de Santander, 680002 Bucaramanga, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9599-7891

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing the recovery factor in oil fields is a critical task for improving reservoir performance and energy sustainability. This study investigates the novel application of graphene oxide (GO) nanoparticles as an enhanced oil recovery (EOR) agent in heavy oilfields, with an integrated multiscale approach combining laboratory experiments and numerical reservoir simulation. The nanofluids were optimized by evaluating the influence of salinity (300-900 ppm), pH (4-8), and GO concentrations (0.03-0.09 wt %) on interfacial tension (IFT) and wettability. Under optimal conditions (900 ppm brine, pH 8, and 0.09 wt % GO), the IFT decreased from 32.5 to 15.8 mN/m, and the contact angle shifted from 140° (oil-wet) to 90° (intermediate). Coreflooding tests confirmed the EOR potential of GO nanofluids, achieving 63.60% oil recovery compared to 56.72% with conventional waterflooding, an incremental gain of 7%. Relative permeability curves and advanced wettability indices (Lak and modified Lak) validated wettability alteration effects. To evaluate the scalability of this technology, the experimental data were incorporated into a numerical simulation using CMG-STARS. First, a history-matched core-scale model was developed to reproduce laboratory results. Then, a conceptual reservoir model was constructed using representative petrophysical properties from Colombian fields. The reservoir-scale simulation showed that nano-GO injection could yield an additional 402,431 barrels of oil over a 20-year period compared to conventional waterflooding, while maintaining a more favorable water cut. These findings highlight the potential of GO nanofluids as a viable and scalable EOR strategy for heavy-oil reservoirs. Future studies will focus on field-scale validation, economic feasibility, and environmental impact.

Identifiers

PMID41658060
PMCPMC12878741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.