Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41658035›Full record

ArticleHardwareX2025

Open source inert gas glove box.

Mottaghi Maryam, M Pearce Joshua

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HardwareX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mottaghi MaryamDepartment of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Western University, London, Canada.
M Pearce JoshuaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Ivey Business School, Western University, London, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A glove box is a controlled environment used for a wide range of scientific experiments. While glove boxes provide significant advantages, their high economic costs ranging from over $1,000 to over $15,000 limits their accessibility in under-resourced labs. There are lower-cost DIY designs available on the internet, but they have not been well characterized nor validated. To overcome these limitations, in this study, an open source glove box design is developed for scientific applications using readily available components and digital distributed manufacturing using open-source RepRap-class 3D printers. The ability of the glove box to hold an inert atmosphere is quantified using an oxygen analyzer. The open source glove box can be customized to the dimensions of the user and the volume of the experiment. The design also enables the use of customizable transfer chambers that can be adjusted based on the scientific application. The open source glove box is built from a low-cost enclosure while preventing contamination. The highly portable device can reduce oxygen down to 19 ppm using an inert gas. The economic savings of the validated device compared to proprietary systems is over 95 %.

Indexed as

3D printingEnvironmental controlEnvironment safetyGlove boxInert gasOpen hardware

Identifiers

PMID41658035
PMCPMC12880624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.