ArticleHealth science reports2026
Health Workers' Knowledge and Practice of Developmentally Supportive Care for Premature Infants in Four Ugandan Neonatal Units: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Neonatal units can be stressful for pre-term infants at a time of rapid brain growth and plasticity, which may contribute to poorer developmental outcomes. Environmental modification to protect against negative sensory experiences and provide positive caregiver stimuli is the standard of care, but little is known about practices in low-income settings. We aimed to determine knowledge and practice relating to developmentally-supportive-care in Uganda. Methods: A quantitative survey on knowledge and practice of developmentally-supportive-care was conducted with 135 health workers in four neonatal units. In addition, observations of practices and sound measurements were conducted. Results: Only 36% of respondents reported that stress, and 21% that parental interaction can affect brain development, and knowledge of stress reduction was limited. 84% of respondents reported actions to protect infants from excessive light in their unit, 33% from excessive sound, and 69% from sleep disruption. The main perceived benefit of family involvement in care was to reduce parental stress levels (67%), with infection risk perceived as the main negative (71%). Workers at the largest volume facility had the lowest knowledge and practice, with wide variations across facilities. All units had sound readings over recommended levels. Conclusion: Knowledge and practice of DSC in this setting were low and needs to be improved to ensure that pre-terms in this setting both survive and thrive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.