ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2026
A brain-constrained neural model of cognition and language with NEST: transitioning from the Felix framework.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- What is so hard about abstract words, anyways? A neuromechanistic explanation using brain-constrained neural network models.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2026Article
- Article
- From cortical and white matter structure to meaning: a brain-constrained neural network of semantic grounding in action and perception.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We introduce a brain-constrained neurocomputational model designed to simulate higher cognitive functions of the human brain, implemented using NEST, a widely used open-source simulator optimised for high-performance spiking neural network simulations. Previously implemented in the custom-built C-based Felix simulation library, transitioning the model to NEST enhances accessibility, reproducibility, and computational efficiency. At the cellular level, the model comprises spiking excitatory neurons and local inhibitory neurons, whereas at the network level, it replicates the structural and functional organisation of 12 cortical regions spanning frontal, temporal, and occipital cortices, along with their associated inter-area connectivity. Additionally, global inhibition mechanisms and neuronal noise are integrated. Learning in the model follows biologically plausible Hebbian plasticity principles, incorporating both long-term potentiation and long-term depression. To validate the NEST implementation, we replicated previous simulation findings obtained with the Felix-based model. The new implementation successfully reproduced the same topographical distribution of cell assemblies following associative learning of object and action words within action and perception systems, replicating a range of previous neuroimaging results. Although the NEST model produced larger cell assemblies than Felix, the overall topographical patterns remained similar, indicating preservation of fundamental network characteristics. Moreover, the transition to NEST significantly enhanced computational efficiency, reducing simulation runtime nearly sixfold compared to Felix. This improvement in computational speed is crucial for expanding the model to include additional cortical regions, such as extending to the right hemisphere, which necessitates increased computational resources. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11571-026-10415-5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.