ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2026
Portal message utilization in orthopedic spine surgery: patterns, predictors, and financial implications.
Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Electronic patient portals (EPPs) facilitate communication between patients and providers, but their utilization and impact in orthopedic spine surgery are poorly defined. This study aims to quantify portal message volume and content, identified demographic predictors of high utilization, and estimated the associated administrative and financial burden. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of 833 new patients presenting to a single tertiary-care orthopedic spine practice over 6 months (April 2-October 31, 2024). Portal messages were categorized by timeframe and subject matter. Patients were classified as low- or high-volume (HV) users, with HV defined as ≥4 messages. Demographic predictors were assessed using independent t-tests and chi-square analyses. Messages meeting Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) criteria for billable Evaluation and Management (E/M) services were identified and assigned reimbursement values. A Monte Carlo simulation (100,000 iterations; R v4.5.1) estimated lost revenue from unbilled encounters. Results: A total of 548 portal messages were sent (median 0 messages per patient; IQR 0-1). Common message topics included appointment scheduling ( Conclusions: Electronic patient portal (EPP) use in orthopedic spine surgery is highly skewed, with a small subset of patients generating disproportionate message volume. Despite limited billable encounters, portal messaging represents a growing administrative burden. Observed racial disparities highlight the need to further evaluate equity in digital patient engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.